dev · 2026-05-01

Datadog vs Grafana Cloud cost comparison

Compare Datadog vs Grafana Cloud annual cost based on hosts, custom metrics, log volume, and APM throughput.

Grafana annual savings
$13,236

Inputs

Hosts monitored50
Custom metrics (per-host)1,500
Logs ingested GB/month250
APM services12
Datadog host $/month$23
Grafana host $/month$0

Supporting metrics

Datadog annual cost$29,184
Grafana Cloud annual cost$15,948

About this calculator

Datadog or Grafana Cloud — when the bill becomes the deciding factor

Datadog has the best UX in observability. It also has the highest bill. For organizations under 100 hosts, the convenience usually wins. Above 200 hosts, the bill compels evaluation.

The cost components (Datadog)

What blows up Datadog bills

  1. Custom metrics explosion: Prometheus-style high-cardinality labels create thousands of series per host. A naive "user_id as metric label" → millions of metrics → 10x bill spike.
  2. Verbose logs: app logs at INFO level for everything = TB/month at $3-5/GB
  3. Long retention: 30-day retention default; 90-day retention 3x cost

Where Grafana Cloud wins

Where Datadog wins

FAQ

How big are real-world bill differences?

At 200 hosts with 1k custom metrics each + 500 GB logs/mo + 30 APM services: Datadog ~$30k/mo, Grafana Cloud ~$8-12k/mo. At 1,000 hosts: Datadog ~$150k/mo, Grafana ~$30-50k/mo. The gap widens dramatically at scale.

Should I self-host Grafana?

If team has SRE bandwidth: maybe. Self-hosted Mimir + Loki + Tempo on Kubernetes is genuinely complex; expect 0.5-1 FTE forever. For most companies <500 hosts, Grafana Cloud Pro is cheaper than self-hosting + the FTE.

What about migration cost?

Significant. Dashboards: not portable (different query languages). Alerts: not portable. Integrations: re-do agent installs. Realistic migration: 4-8 weeks for a 50-host environment, 2 SREs full-time. Don't switch unless annual savings >$50k.