business · 2026-05-01
Compute SaaS Rule of 40 score (revenue growth + profit margin) and benchmark against public-comparable thresholds for Series A through IPO.
| Annual revenue (ARR) | $12,000,000 |
| Prior year revenue | $8,500,000 |
| Annual EBITDA | $1,500,000 |
| Revenue growth rate | 41.2% |
| EBITDA margin | 12.5% |
| Public-comp percentile | 80 |
Rule of 40 = revenue growth rate + EBITDA margin
A SaaS company that grows 50% YoY at -10% EBITDA margin scores 40. Same company growing 20% at +20% margin also scores 40. The thesis: investors should value either profile equally — growth and profitability are interchangeable in the long run.
Public-market default: EBITDA margin (faster to compute from public filings). Operator default: FCF margin (more honest, captures CapEx and SBC). Use FCF for internal benchmarking; EBITDA for public-comp benchmarking.
Some analysts adjust for sales-efficiency: Rule of 40 + (LTV/CAC − 3). Penalizes companies hitting R40 by burning capital inefficiently on growth. The adjustment is opinionated; standard R40 is fine for most decisions.
Small denominators make growth rates volatile and margins noisy. Below ~$5M ARR, R40 is dominated by accidents of timing (whether you happen to invoice annually or monthly). Most VCs ignore Rule of 40 below Series B; meaningful only at $20M+ ARR.