Health & fitness · free calculator
One-rep max estimator
Estimate 1RM from a sub-max set using Brzycki, Epley, and Lombardi formulas — averaged for a robust prediction.
Estimated 1RM (lb)
Average of Brzycki/Epley/Lombardi
Show the work
- Brzycki 1RM253
- Epley 1RM263
- Lombardi 1RM264
- 80% training weight208
- 70% training weight182
1RM math — three formulas averaged, because no single one is right
Three classic 1RM estimators, each calibrated against different rep ranges:
- Brzycki (most cited):
weight × 36 / (37 - reps)— accurate at 2-10 reps, breaks down outside - Epley:
weight × (1 + reps/30)— slightly conservative, smoother across rep ranges - Lombardi:
weight × reps^0.10— power curve, holds up better at higher reps
The arithmetic mean of all three is more robust than any single formula. At 3-6 reps the spread is tight (within 2-3%); at 10+ reps the formulas diverge and accuracy drops.
How to use this
- Test set: pick a weight you can move with strict form, RIR 0 (no reps left in tank). Aim for 3-6 reps for best accuracy.
- Use the estimate, not the test: program training off the estimated 1RM, not your tested 1RM. Testing every cycle burns recovery.
- 80% / 70% column: typical strength block uses 70-90% of 1RM. The columns shown are common training percentages.
Caveats
These formulas assume standard barbell movements (squat, bench, deadlift, OHP). They overshoot on high-velocity lifts (cleans, snatches) and undershoot on slow grinders (deadlifts done to lockout from a dead stop).
Track 1RM trends, not absolute values. A 5 lb week-over-week increase in estimated 1RM means progress; the absolute number matters less than the slope.
Export
CSVPrintable PDFEmbedNot sure which calc you need? Ask →Related calculators